Monday, November 30, 2009

Managing your own menopause/andropause

I have found that by researching my own specific health issues, I can find the kinds of solutions that work for me and my husband Mike. For example, when I first started into perimenopause, I read about how wonderful soy products were because of their phyto-estrogen properties. I started eating everything soy, learned all new recipes, and began to love it.

Then I developed the worst case of hives I could have ever imagined. I had weeping sores over half of my body, and they were spreading FAST! It took three different types of doctors to figure out how allergic I was to soy, so of course, I stopped eating it. Twenty days later my hives SLOWLY started going away.

We have also had to go through similar “experiments” to help Mike successfully manage his chronic fatigue symptoms, which included some andropause issues like a total lack of pregnenolone (the mother of all hormones in your body) Finding the right balance of supplements for your specific case is essential and takes time and experimentation.  We can highly recommend Dr. Myhill in the UK for practical solutions that work!

My advice to manage your own menopause or andropause problems? First of all, find a health care professional you respect and trust implicitly. Make sure that they keep up with the latest research in this area, and then go with your gut. But remember, you are the ultimate expert on your own body!

If they give you the creeps on any level, get out of their office. Get thorough blood tests to see the total picture of what’s happening in your body at menopause or andropause, including all the more complicated hormone levels like pregnenolone, cortisol, and the three testosterone levels (for men.)

And then use your own brain and gut to decide what will work for you, what you can live with, and what makes you feel better both emotionally and physically.

I admit it isn’t easy, because many doctors in the U.S. right now don’t seem to do their research, or know very much about these issues. Doctors and researchers in other countries like England seem far ahead of us in this area. But the internet offers you the unique opportunity to educate yourself and be healthy out there!

[Via http://agingresearch.wordpress.com]

Friday, November 27, 2009

Battle of the middle-aged bulge: pick your poison

That age old battle of the bulge just got more challenging.. Researchers are saying that middle-aged women who store fat around their mid section are twice as likely as their peers to develop dementia in old age. Yikes! More reason than ever to lose that belly fat, right?

Starting in 1960, researchers looked healthy and lifestyle risk factors in 1,462 women and then at various intervals for 32 years. They found that women who were broader around the waist than the hips by the time they reached middle-aged more than twice the odds of developing dementia if they lived beyond 70 years. However, a higher body-mass index did not infer a similar risk.

Whether it’s associated with aging, testosterone or declining physical activity, weight gain around the midsection has been linked with the metabolic syndrome, which increases your risk for heart attack and stroke.

So, we’re left with a choice – heart attack, stroke or losing our minds….Or, better yet, move your body. Exercise, start eating healthier and being more mindful of what’s going in and what you are putting out. Granted, we may not be able to fight the inevitable but we can at least try to stave it off or control it as much as possible. The bulge around the middle is the hardest area to attack. But it’s not impossible.

I’d love to get some fitness experts to weigh in on this. Anyone?

[Via http://flashfree.wordpress.com]

Monday, November 23, 2009

Pfizer Jury Awards $28 Million Over Hormone Drugs

More bad news for hormone replacement drugs. More women should turn to natural menopause relief

Pfizer Jury Awards $28 Million Over Hormone Drugs (Update2) – Bloomberg.com

By Sophia Pearson

 

Nov. 23 (Bloomberg) — Two Pfizer Inc. units were ordered to pay a total of $28 million in punitive damages to an Illinois woman who developed breast cancer after taking the companies’ menopause drugs.

Wyeth should pay $16 million and Pharmacia & Upjohn $12 million to Donna Kendall of Decatur, Illinois, a state-court jury in Philadelphia said today. The jury ruled Nov. 20 that the units owed Kendall $6.3 million in compensatory damages.

The verdict brings to more than $165 million the total awarded in cases linking hormone-replacement drugs and breast cancer since they began going to trial in 2006. More than 6 million women have taken the medicines to treat menopause symptoms including hot flashes, night sweats and mood swings.

“Neither the awards of punitive damages nor the liability verdicts were supported by the evidence or the law,” Pfizer spokesman Christopher Loder said in a phone interview. “We plan to challenge both decisions in post-trial motions and, if necessary, through an appeal.”

Until 1995, many patients combined Premarin, Wyeth’s estrogen-based drug, with progestin-laden Provera, made by Upjohn. Wyeth combined the two hormones in Prempro. The drugs are still on the market.

New York-based Pfizer, the world’s largest drugmaker, completed the $68 billion purchase of Wyeth on Oct. 15. The company reported 2008 net income of $8.1 billion on sales of $48.3 billion.

Pfizer rose 26 cents to $18.62 at 2:32 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading.

The case is Kendall v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., 040600965, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

To contact the reporter on this story: Sophia Pearson in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court at 7613 or spearson3@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 23, 2009 14:45 EST

menopause, pfizer,

[Via http://feminestra.wordpress.com]

Exercise and brain power

Exercise for your brain's sake!

I’m always on the lookout for good information on wellness and brain power, as I want to do everything I can to defeat a withering mind before it starts. Recently I heard John Tesh talking about this on the radio, and I just had to share it with you. Another reason to keep moving and keep that excess weight off!

From John Tesh:  New research shows that if you’re overweight, you’re literally frying your brain. Here are the details from The Los Angeles Times: Scientists from UCLA and the University of Pittsburgh gave MRIs to a group of volunteers to measure the size of their brains. When they compared the results to the person’s weight, they found some disturbing connections:

  • People who were overweight had 4% less brain tissue than those who were at a normal weight.
  • The heavier someone was, the greater the damage. Obese participants were missing more than 8% of their brain tissue.

The majority of the loss occurred in the areas that coordinate movement, but regions associated with decision making, long-term memory, and attention span also took a hit. Unfortunately, it gets worse. Carrying extra weight also aged the brain prematurely. The brains of the overweight people looked eight years older than normal, and the brains of obese people looked 16 years older! What does that mean? That fat is bad for your brain.

A study from the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research found that those with the fattest arms between the ages of 40 and 45 were 59% more likely to have dementia later in life. Another study found that obese people with large bellies were a shocking 260% more likely to develop dementia. Study author Rachel Witmer says the biggest risk is the fat that hangs over your belly, most likely because of the hormones and inflammatory factors it produces. There is some good news. A follow-up study found that exercise will slow or even reverse the brain damage – provided you eat right. So make sure you stick to healthy, whole foods, for your brain’s sake!

[Via http://fabulousfifties.wordpress.com]

Friday, November 20, 2009

Happy Birthday to Me

On November 22, I am turning 42. There will be no sorry-ass mid-life crisis, because I am so unconcerned with age that I actually had to do the calculations to remember how old I am in the first place.

[Side note: If anyone deserves the drama and attention of a mid-life crisis, it's my 45-year old girlfriend Brigitte, whose hair has been almost completely white since she was 23. This week, the triage nurse at the vaccination centre turned to me and said, "You and your daughter can get the shot tonight, but your mother will have to come back later." ]

So in honour of my upcoming birthday, here is my initial list of things to love about being 42:

  • I don’t have to think about what I want to be when I grow up. It’s already too late.
  • I know who I am.
  • I like how I’ve turned out.
  • And I almost never give a rat’s ass what anyone else thinks about it.
  • I’ve passed the age of onset for all the major mental disorders (esp. those that run in my family). Maybe not with flying colours, but I’ve passed.
  • On my 40th birthday, my daughter pronounced me “medium young”. I think I’m still covered.
  • My breasts are no longer perky, but now I have the option of tucking them in.
  • Sexual peak, ladies. It’s not a myth.
  • I have cool retro skills like using a rotary telephone and playing Pong. I absolutely kick ass at pong.
  • I have replaced the deadly combination of energy and neurosis with serenity and life experience. Well, most days. When I take my meds.
  • Parenting gets progressively easier every year after 30. No one under 30 should have to parent- it’s just cruel.
  • Plucking out those little chin hairs is doing wonders for my hand-eye coordination.
  • Menopause is going to be a beautiful, liberating celebration of the next phase of my life. Right? Yes?
  • If my hot flashes kick in before winter, I won’t have to put plastic on all the damned windows.
  • I rarely have to stand up on the bus anymore.
  • I have never spent a dime on age-defying anything. I don’t own a single product containing bovine colostrum, donkey-hide gelatin or snake venom.
  • I still have things to look forward to, like binge drinking in my 50s and  hip-hop when I’m 70.
  • Young, cool and artistic people still like hanging around with me. Well, Sara does. Thank you, Sara.
  • Now that I am not young, I can no longer be blamed for downfall of western civilization. (Of course, as I age in a country with free medical care, I will suck the economy dry, but presumably western civilization will carry on.)
  • No matter how old, saggy and tired I get, I will always have Brigitte. And she is fucking HOT.

Your turn Internet. Post a comment and wish me a happy birthday!

    Thursday, November 19, 2009

    Becoming a Mom Over 40: What It’s Really Like

    Amy Ruiz By Jennifer Graham Kizer
    From Health magazine

    Last year, a 70-year-old Indian woman named Omkari Panwar made medical history as the oldest woman to give birth. She and her husband conceived via in vitro fertilization, and Omkari delivered boy-girl twins via C-section. The couple had two daughters and five grandchildren, but they had always wanted a son.

    Related links:
    • Time.com: A Hope to Prolong Fertility: Ovarian Transplants
    • Pregnancy Odds: Fertility Success Rates in Your 30s and 40
    • The Perfect Age to Have Kids? Depends Whom (and When) You Ask

    As radical as that story seems, the idea of having kids later in life is not. Medical advances—including in vitro fertilization, using donor eggs and/or sperm to conceive, and enlisting carriers—have all but erased the notion of a biological clock. In fact, between 1997 and 2007, the birth rate among American women ages 45 to 49 shot up 50%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

    The CDC doesn’t even have comparable data for moms over 50, because this trend is so new. Along with news reports of older moms from coast to coast (Frieda Birnbaum of New Jersey had twins at 60, and Janise Wulf of California had a baby at 62), there’s a growing number of support groups such as PregnancyAfter50.com, MotherhoodLater.com, and the Yahoo! group babiesafter50.

    But there is a flip side to this phenomenon. In the June issue of Health, we reported on the health dangers of later-in-life pregnancy. Now, in part two of our series, we investigate the challenges these older moms face—from the stigma of being the oldest mom on the playground to unexpected, even life-threatening, health issues. Read on for three women’s honest stories.

    Next: Joanie Shook, 47

    Joanie Shook, 47
    Emmylou and Maggie, 23 months; Bernadette, 9
    Scio, Oregon

    For most of my adult life, I was a “single career woman.” No kids? No problem. I was busy dating, socializing, and seizing career opportunities. (I work in health administration.) So I wasn’t troubled when, in my early 30s, I was diagnosed with premature ovarian failure, which left me infertile. I didn’t mind—apart from the thought that it might make my boobs droop!

    Eventually, I met my husband, Greg, and I got a lovely package deal: he had an adopted daughter, Bernadette, who’s now 9, from his first marriage.

    Problem was, he wanted more kids. “Well, you’re barking up the wrong tree,” I told him early on. “I can’t help you out there.” Ironically, he had had infertility issues, too. But one day, something made me look up fertility treatments on the Internet. I loved my husband so much that I wanted to do whatever I could to make him happy.

    At a consultation with a fertility specialist in October 2006, when I was 44, we learned that we could try an in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment using donor eggs and an intracytoplasmic injection of my husband’s sperm (where a single sperm is directly injected into the egg). In March 2007, we chose our donor, who we dubbed Nel—as in Nice Egg Lady. I was placed on a strict protocol of hormone therapy. We did our embryo transfer in May 2007, and I got pregnant. Through the 13th week of pregnancy, I took regular progesterone injections—which my ovaries would have supplied had they been working.

    Though I was 45 (and thus considered high risk), it was a near-perfect pregnancy. My ovaries may have been kaput, but the rest of my reproductive organs were strong. (My doctor joked to me, “Your cervix could hold Arnold Schwarzenegger.”) At 37 weeks, I gave birth to our healthy twins, Emmylou and Maggie.

    Now, I’m nearly 48, my girls are pushing 2, and … yes, I’m often mistaken for their grandmother. In our rural town, you’re not rolling in a lot of older moms, and I wasn’t prepared for the sidelong glances or the comments like, “Oh, are they yours?”

    I didn’t mind the idea that people thought I looked old. But at first, “Are they yours?” made me wonder if people were referring to donor eggs. Were they asking if my babies were genetically mine? That hurt my feelings. Sure, I used donor eggs. But my girls are so mine, my eggs or not.

    I’ve since come to realize that “Are they yours?” usually means, “Are you the mother or the grandmother?” To me, that question is less offensive. I wear my age as a badge of honor. When I answer “Yes,” it’s as if I’m saying, “Look how strong I am, that at my age I can have these beautiful babies.”

    True, there are plenty of days when I feel alienated. I’ve become a stay-at-home mom, and when I drop off our 9-year-old Bernie at school, it’s pretty obvious how much older I am than the other moms. I can only imagine how it’s going to be in five years, when I take the twins to school.

    And there are little reminders that I hail from a different decade. At mommy-baby get-togethers, the other moms dress younger. And there’s a technological gap. At the playground, they’re texting. And I’m not always up on the latest Twitter topics.

    But the only true downside to being an older mom is being older. It’s grunting when you get up off the floor. I would love to have my younger body back. But the fact is, I couldn’t have done this 10 years ago. I wasn’t financially secure enough. And I’m far more appreciative now than I would have been in my younger days.

    My husband has been my rock. I can’t tell you how many times we just look at each other over the chaos and laugh. Greg is the CEO, Chief Entertainment Officer, and I’m more inclined to be the Chief Operations Officer. I give the baths, feed the kids, and get the little ones into pajamas. We’re a very close family.

    At the library’s story time last week, the twins sat down to color for the
    first time, and I started to cry. I said, “Look what Emmylou did!” And I let
    it flow, because at my age, I don’t care what people think. I really do appreciate the little things, because I never expected to have them.

    Next: Elizabeth Allen, 51

    Elizabeth Allen, 51
    Luke and Jake, 7 months; Elizabeth, 26; Ashley and Kristin, 22
    Oyster Bay, New York

    Seven months ago, I gave birth to my precious twins, Luke and Jake. They are an answered prayer. Would I recommend pregnancy and childbirth to others over 50? “Listen to my story,” I’d say. “And decide for yourself.”
    In 2006, I married my husband, Daniel, 51—a second marriage for both
    of us. We both had grown children from our first marriages, but we wanted to have a family together.

    I’m a registered nurse, so I knew that pregnancy at age 48 was considered high risk. But I felt young. I was in good shape, and I still had my period. So I didn’t think any of the complications would happen to me. Still, I heard out the fertility specialist, who presented us with the health risks that older women face. In the past, I’d had a few episodes of tachycardia, which is a faster-than-normal heart rate. I knew that the physical stress of pregnancy might bring it on again. I saw a cardiologist, who did a cardiac stress test, an EKG, and an echocardiogram. I passed the tests easily. I also underwent a mammogram. The doctors said that I was healthy enough to have a baby.

    Getting pregnant was easy, but staying pregnant proved difficult. I did in vitro, got pregnant, and had a miscarriage. I did in vitro again, got pregnant, and had another miscarriage. I switched fertility doctors, and had all kinds of blood work done. It turned up a gene mutation called MTHFR that can cause blood clots that keep nutrients from getting to the placenta. But it was treatable with anticoagulants.

    I tried again, and eventually got pregnant with twins—at age 50. We were thrilled, despite my OB-GYN’s warning that carrying more than one baby would be stressful for my body.

    And how right she was. At 26 weeks, the problems began. First, the anticoagulants weakened a blood vessel in my uterus—so much so that it ruptured and caused heavy bleeding. I thought I was miscarrying again, but after a brief hospital stay, I moved past it. Around that time, my doctor suggested that I go on bed rest and use a wheelchair. As if I had a choice! Just walking from the La-Z-Boy to the bathroom, I would get short of breath. The babies felt heavy and stressful on my whole body. My legs swelled.

    At 28 weeks, I felt the sensation of my heart beating at twice its normal speed. I knew instantly that this was tachycardia, and if there had been any doubt before, it was now clear that carrying two babies was too much for my heart to take. I spent four days receiving intravenous and oral medication at the cardiac-care unit of the hospital. But Dan was always at my side, and throughout the ordeal, the babies continued to do great.

    With medication, the doctors kept my heart under control. But in the weeks that followed, I didn’t feel right. Exhausted and swollen, I would go back and forth to my doctor’s office for test after test. Finally, when I was at 35 weeks, I lost the ability to urinate. This time, the doctor tested my blood for creatinine, a chemical waste molecule that gets filtered out of the blood and passed via urine. The level was unusually high, which tends to signal renal failure. My kidneys were shutting down. For the first time, I was frightened for my life.

    On May 5, 2009, my OB-GYN did an emergency C-section. Dan held my hand the whole time, and my healthy babies sailed through the procedure. But I couldn’t concentrate on them. I had lost 25 pounds of fluid, sending my body into hypovolemic shock caused by lowered blood flow throughout the body, which is a life-threatening condition. My temperature dropped to 96 degrees. I shook with cold and fear, fighting to stay alive. My very concerned doctor pumped me full of fluids, and I spent the next 10 hours in the recovery room. Dan stayed by my side, reassuring me that I would be all right. I wasn’t 100% cognizant, but I knew that my very survival was touch and go.

    At some point during that critical postpartum time, my kidneys began to function. Thank God! After five days in the hospital, I headed home—still swollen, weak, and anemic, but beginning to bounce back.

    It would be another two months before I truly felt better, and I’m still not myself. Even now, I struggle against constant fatigue. But we’re fortunate enough to be able to afford in-home child care. We had a health-care worker for the first six weeks, and we’ve had a babysitter every day since then. I also have a lot of family nearby. And, luckily, I haven’t hit menopause yet, so I’m not dealing with those discomforts.

    As for my kidneys, the renal failure was strictly due to the physical stress of two babies. Now that they’re out, my kidneys are fine. Nor have I had a problem with tachycardia, though I do plan to undergo ablation therapy—a treatment that prevents it from happening again.

    In retrospect, I ought to have undergone ablation therapy before I got pregnant. I also could have used a gestational carrier. I’d considered hiring one, but then thought, No, I can do this. I didn’t realize that I would be risking my life. Nor did Dan, who had moments right before our twins’ birth when he was petrified he was going to lose me.

    But we don’t regret having our twins. If we try for another baby, though, I’ll be using a gestational carrier.

    Next: Randi Carol, 60

    Amy Ruiz

    Randi Carol, 60
    Twin boy and girl, 20 months
    Queens, New York

    Like a lot of mothers with babies in my neighborhood, I take my twins to a weekly, mommy-and-me type program. Singing songs and playing games, we mothers can’t get enough of our delicious toddlers. At times, I’m even oblivious to the fact that I’m the oldest person in the room. At 60, I may be the oldest person on the block.

    Why did I wait so long to become a mother? I’ve always liked children, and even worked with them daily for more than two decades, as a social worker. But I did not get in touch with my strong desire to have my own until after my clock had finished ticking. Then there was the inconvenient fact that I never met the right partner.

    At 50, I did some soul searching. I realized that I really, truly, adamantly wanted to be a mother. My two sisters, who are both married with children, were wary of me having a baby—especially as a single person. This didn’t deter me, though.

    At my age, my odds of adopting a newborn were slim, and I feared that a pregnancy might compromise my health. So I searched for an egg donor, a sperm donor, and a gestational carrier to deliver my baby. It took five harrowing years—filled with dishonest or incompetent doctors, donors, carriers, and fertility agencies. I spent more than $100,000, much of it lost in fraudulent deals and outright scams. At times, I was beside myself with anger and disappointment. But finally, on April 12, 2008, a gestational carrier delivered my gorgeous, boy-girl twins from frozen embryos I received from a couple in Glen Cove, New York. (They actually have 8-year-old boy-girl twins that they conceived with embryos from the same batch as the one my embryos came from.)

    I know that some people can’t imagine chasing after two young children at my age. It’s definitely not for everyone. Like any toddlers, my twins are natural-born explorers, always raring to go. I’m not thrilled when I find my brand new cell phone soaking in my Diet Coke or when I discover that one of them has accidentally dialed the NYPD. (Yes, I had a policeman show up at my door once, and the twins toddled up behind me, big grins on their faces.) After the babies go to sleep, I have to clean up after all the day’s shenanigans, pushing my bedtime well past midnight.

    And there have been bigger challenges—like the two-week period when we all had a stomach bug, and I cared for all three of us by myself. It was horrible! But you do what you have to do, and I rose to the occasion.

    Like any single mother, I get overwhelmed. But a few days a week, I drop them off at a babysitter’s house to go shopping or to the hairdresser. My younger sister works nearby and often visits us during her lunch hour.

    Naturally, I’d love to meet somebody who completes the picture here. I’d like to have a partner and father figure for my kids. When my single friends chat about dates, I don’t have my own tales to contribute. I’ve dated a little bit since I’ve had the babies, but bringing them to the babysitter is a production, so I don’t go out too often.

    My life isn’t much different from any single mother. I belong to the Mothers of Twins Club of Queens. The other mothers are younger, but I don’t feel that my age is a major barrier.

    While I’m not hung up on the age issue, I am insulted when people sometimes express disbelief that I’m the mom. It happened recently at the hair salon. The hairdresser said, “Are they your grandchildren?” I said, “No, they’re my children.” And he said something like, “Wow, that’s a good one.” I let it go, but I think that people ought to be more aware of what they say. These days, there are more older mothers.

    And we have some advantages over our younger counterparts. I was able to quit my job when I had the babies. Unlike mothers in their 20s, I don’t have the stress of work or school or wondering, “What am I going to do with my life?” We live off of my pension. Sure, it’s a fixed income, but big expenses, like their college tuition, are still distant on the horizon. Eventually, I’ll go back to work part-time.

    There’s a notion that it’s irresponsible to have children so late in life, because you might not be around for them as they move into adulthood. Loving a child in the right way is the most important thing, as is being emotionally healthy as a parent. In that sphere, I’m much better equipped than I was in my 20s and 30s. And since there are two of them, they will always have each other. Plus, they have the two siblings in Glen Cove. That couple and their twins have already come to visit. I hope that my twins will have a relationship with their older siblings. And while I haven’t made a will, I feel that if anything were to happen to me, that couple would be potential candidates to adopt my twins.

    But who knows? I always say if I dance at their 40th birthday, my life will be complete. My parents are already north of 80 and in great shape. That bodes well for my longevity, too.

    Wednesday, November 18, 2009

    And by anxiety, we mean 'expense.'

    In case you missed the controversy sparked yesterday by the “government task force” (can anything sound more Orwellian? who are these people?) over new mammography guidelines, and let’s be honest, I doubt you did: women should start having mammograms at 50, not 40,  and every other year, to reduce ‘anxiety.’ Because the aforementioned anxiety, the possibility of ’unnecessary biopsies’ &c., for the majority who will not be diagnosed with cancer outweighs the inconvenience of death for the few people who will.

    Now, I too can dig my John Stuart Mill, but that sounds like some crazy utilitarian bullshit to me.

     And oh, also, breast self-exams are useless and should not be encouraged.

    The age debate got me thinking about the mammograms I had done of my left breast, the ones with USLs: unidentified suspicious lesions (still unidentified and suspicious as of this posting). When I handed my file, with an oncologist-ordered mammogram, over to the lady behind the desk of the breast screening department at Charing Cross, she said:

    “You can’t have a mammogram because you’re under thirty-five.”

    And I stared at her, bald and incredulous. And I wanted to say:

    “Can you apply that logic to the cancer in there?”

    Three times in the past couple of weeks I have been asked my age, and each time I hesitated. I honestly couldn’t say. Saying “twenty-five” seemed absurd. Because whatever it is you associate with being twenty-five–like having the rest of your life ahead of you, when “the rest of your life” is something long and non-hypothetical–that’s not what I am.

    I remember discussing immortality in sixth grade. The teacher asked us, a group of 12-year-olds, what would be the perfect age to spend eternity as.

    For some reason, the class consensus was 25.

    I wonder what seemed so magical about it. Myself, I’d chosen 10. Maybe even then I had a premonition. Or maybe I was just a strange, precocious pubescent, already nostalgic for my youth.

    Something else that is strange. During my last checkup, the nurse asked about my Tamoxifen side effects in near baby-talk: “Are you having little hot flashes or anything?”

    I’m tired of having my cancer cute-ified because of my age. I’m terrified by what the chemotherapy and the Tamoxifen have done to my body. I hate that I’ve gone through menopause in my twenties. I hate that I haven’t had a period since July, maybe earlier. I’m worried that I’ll never have one again.

     And there’s nothing “little” about my flashes, lady.

    Re: mammograms, The American Cancer Society and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists are sticking to the earlier recommendation of 40.

    Guess they’re not part of the Force.  

    (YSC’s response here)